3/5/98
[sources: the following is based primarily on Marchand, Roland,
Advertising the American dream : making way for modernity,
1920-1940 (Berkeley : University of California Press, c1985 [S
McCabe HF5813.U6 M26 1985. Illustrations on Handout class #14. For
further titles see bibliography" "Advertising"]
Introduction
*discussions of the history of advertising have taken three major
approaches.
1. Advertising as false or manipulative in the interest of class or
corporate "control"
a. "Truth-in Advertising Campaigns ca. 1910s
b. Ads as part of corporatist "social control," see e.g. Ewen,
Stuart, Channels of desire : mass images and the shaping of
American consciousness (New York : McGraw-Hill, 1982) viii, 312
p. [Bryn Mawr] Canaday HF5813.U6 E95 1982
2. Advertising "mirror" of what society wants: thus beneficial:
democratizing, stability, creating national market of mass production
and cheap goods
3. Advertising as "therapeutic". Sees complex interaction between
admen and audience, with advertising being a substitute religion that
eases the way to "modernity," albeit with mixed consequences. e.g.
Marchand, Roland, Advertising the American dream
**following the last of these approaches, this class will also look
at the relation between "advertising, "scientism" and
"modernism."
1. advertising intersects with "scientism" at three levels
a. actual contributions, especially from psychology. the most notable
example was Watson who joined the J. Walter Thompson agency in 1920.
But Printer's Ink was discussing psychology in the 1890s. See
Printer's Ink article "Partnership." See also Walter Dill
Scott, The Psychology of Advertising (1903){McCabe: HF5822
.S43]. (Lears, "From Salvation," p. 19)
b. role of advertisers vis a vis public: "professionalizion" and
expert
c. part of complexity mechanics of consumer culture, whereby
"products" are separated from "work", "objects" from the "words"
associated with them.
"*Lears example. Meaning "revolutionary" has taken in consumer
culture. See Jerry Rubin, Do it" " a revolution in toilet
paper."
***more importantly it demonstrates the intersection of "scientism"
with "modernism," including the latter's doubts and anxieties about
the place of "modernization." Note: a parallel argument for American
culture in between the wars is made in David Hollinger, "The Knower
and the Artificer," American Quarterly 39 (1987), 37-55.
As Marchand, Advertising p. 359 puts it:
"One mode of response by Americans to the modernization of their
society . . .had been to split life into two distinct spheres: the
hard, rational, competitive, and impersonal realm of work and
economic transactions; and the soft, sentimental, intimate world of
home, family and warm personal relationships. [he might also have
added leisure and sports]. ...But people did not prove amenable to so
rigid a compartmentalization of their lives. Their desires for
psychological gratification and personal interaction spilled messily
over from the world of private intimacy into the public realm of
economic transactions."
I. Advertising 1860s-1900
*although advertising grew steadily, and helped create a national
economy and mass production, it was not initially aimed at creating
new wants, but carving out a larger share of a market already assumed
to exist. By the 1890s, however, a new approach appeared that
stressed the creation of desire.
A. 19th century roots
B. Change in 1890s
C. WWI gives a boost (Marchand p. 5)
*see Illustration . #1[ 1.1, 1.2]
II. During the 1920s, worked hard to shed its "Barnum" image
(cf. move from "arm chair philosophizing" to quantitative social
science).
A. Pervasive tensions that ran through ads.
1. "Artistic excellence." v. "information".
a. artistic: associated with culture in "Harvard business school
awards," and using associations with Met Museum of Arts
b. But also information
2. Modernity as 'efficiency" but also "regrets"
a. Efficiency came out in claims they were oiling the wheels of
"modernity" through sleek new products.
b. Regret in attempts to create "subjective outlets" and a personal
tone.
B. Results
1. change from a. earlier wherein they sold "product" though
"reasoned" appeals (even though based on a belief that consumers
"irrational" to (b) selling of benefits (psychic." One of the
earliest was "The Skin you Live to Touch." (1911) The key was to make
consumers believe he/she has "lived through" an experience, and hence
retrain a sense of control in an expanding mass society."
* [note: although there was no exact parallel in the careers of
Ogburn, one can see the same objecive-subjective division. Whereas
the earlier antiformalists wished to link the two--i.e to show how
"feelings could be realized in institutions--now a sharp distinction
between mass economy (rationalized) and psychic satisfactions via
consumerism,.
2. specific consequence was "side by side"positioning"
a. advertiser joins consumer. *see Illustration 2 [1.3, 1,4,
4.8]
b. scare copy a variant: "ring around the collar" *see
Illustration 3 [1.5]
c. "friend" was Betty Crocker.
C. Case studies illustrate:
1. Fleischman's Yeast (Marchand pp. 16-18)
2. Listerine (pp. 18 -20) See Illustration 4 [1.8]
c. Kotex (pp. 20-22) See Illustration 5 [1.11]
III. "New Professionals"
*professionalization expressed itself in dislike of references to the
":ad game" and in euphemisms ("consumption engineers")
A. Background
*survey of individuals in 20 largest agencies shows some interesting
characteristics, with both parallels and differences with leaders of
"objectivist" social science. One consequence was that there were
essentially an elite separated from the "masses" they claimed to
represent.
1. Male /female(see Marchand pp. 33-35)
2. WASP. not Jews or other ethnic groups, although not much more
exclusive than other areas of professions. [does however, contrast
with movies and sports management]
3. Relatively high social class. Ivy League
B. Agency subculture develops (pp. 39-44)
1. initially agencies merely bargained for space, then resold it to
individuals who produced their own ads
2. gradually began to offer advice and copy
3. consequences were twofold:
a. a high level of frustration and uncertainty. Marchand pictures
admen as "marginal," deferring to clients while taking pride in
"ingroup displays of virtuosity" (p. 41).The point indirectly is that
the entire culture of the ad agency made the expert-client
relationship impossible (as e.g. in medicine). At the same time it
led to strong attack on the "literary" pretensions of those who tried
to assert themselves.
b, Competitiveness also distinguished from situation of academic and
possibly other experts.
*raises question of relation to "style" and mixture of "scientism"
and "modernism." Possibly different ways that professionals orient to
clients determines their view of themselves as "experts" and subtly
shapes their message. Admen, that is, had reasons both to celebrate
and regret modernization, for its consequences in their own
lives/career. On different ways professions orient to clients
see.Wayne Hobson, "Professionals, Progressives, and
Bureaucratization," Historian
39 (1977), 639-58
B Whatever the reason, their vision of "professionalism" showed the
same tensions as their view of "modernity"
1. one side emphasized standards, public service, culture, uplift.
Stressed advanced education required for admen (# PhDs), and public
service.
2. but other side stressed the hard boiled expert, giving advice to
clients much as would a lawyer.
*battles between these two permeated every level of advertising.
See Illustration 16 [10.5]
*raises question whether really helped (pp. 349-52)
5. "Repersonalized" American life
*Overall consequence: finessing the "complexities of scale" (pp.
359-63)
See Illustration 17 (10.9)