Stat 11
February 27, 2006
Homework #5 (complete version) (due Friday, March 3)
This homework is due at the
start of class Friday, March 3. You may
work in groups (across sections if you like), consult with others, or use any
references or tools that seem useful, but you must write up your solutions
yourself.
Problems from Chapter 4:
4.22, 4.28, 4.46, 4.58, 4.60, 4.64a. (Do 4.64b, if you like, for extra credit.)
For 4.60 and 4.64, a sensible approach is to determine m, s2, and s separately
for each of the two variables and then combine them.
Problems related to estimating a proportion (section 5.1):
Some of these problems use the formula from class:
![]()
1. A simple random sample of 100 people is selected from the 14,000 adult residents of Fort Smith, Arkansas, and those in the sample are asked whether they favor a proposed highway project. It turns out that 55 of those in the sample say yes, they favor the project. (The other 45 said no. Assume that the sampling was done perfectly and that everyone selected gave an honest answer.)
Let p represent the (unknown) fraction of adult residents that favor the project.
a. In this problem, what are
and n ?
b. From the information given, what is the best estimate of p ?
c. What would you use for the standard error of that estimate?
2. Continuing the situation from problem 1…
a. Suppose the actual value of p is 0.50.
(That is, exactly 7000 of the 14000 residents would say yes if
asked. The difference in this problem is
that you know the actual value of
p.) If thousands of samples of
size 100 were done, and a value of
were computed for
each sample, what would be the mean of all the values
? What would be the
standard deviation ?
b. Same questions, but now suppose that the actual value of p is 0.80.
c. The standard deviations you gave in parts a and b are different from the standard error you gave in problem 1c. Are you still comfortable with the answer you gave to problem 1c ? That is, do you think it’s a good way to estimate the standard error in the situation given?
3. A certain university
has declared that historically, 70% of its football players get degrees. You’re skeptical, so in August, 2006, you
undertake a brief investigation. You
obtain from the university an official list of the players that entered the
program during calendar years 1996-2002, carefully select a random sample of 40
of these players, and determine
, the fraction of the sample that got degrees.
a. Suppose that the university’s claim is
true. If you took lots of samples of
size 40 and computed
for each sample, what
would be the mean of these values?
b. What would be the standard deviation?
c. What would be the shape of the distribution
of
values?
d. What fraction of the
values would be 55% or
below?
e. In fact, in your sample, 55% (that is, 22 out of 40) obtained degrees. Is the university’s claim plausible?
f. Can you think of a source of bias in your survey?
(end)