On the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Model

Author: Oswald Espinoza [ profile | email ]

Abstract

The basic version of the least squares model assumes homoskedasticity, the expected value of any given error term, squared, is equal to the variance of all the error terms taken together. When this assumption is violated; that is, where the error terms may reasonably be expected to be larger for some points or ranges in the data than for others, problems will then arise in the standard ordinary least squares analysis. In practice, this issue often arises in financial applications where the key issue is the variance of the error terms itself. The variance of the returns on an asset or portfolio represents the risk level of those returns. Empirical data will often show that some time periods are riskier than others; that is, the expected value of error terms at some times is greater than at others. Moreover, these risky times are not scattered randomly across quarterly or annual data. Instead, there is a degree of autocorrelation in the variance of financial returns. This paper will explore the ARCH (autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity) and GARCH (generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity) models which have become widely accepted tools for dealing with time series heteroskedastic models. Similarly we will also discuss how these models provide a volatility measure that can be used in financial decisions concerning an analysis of risk, portfolio selection, or derivative pricing.

Table of Contents


Complete List of References

Back to Top