|
|
Or Does Lichen Follow
a Colonial/Imperial Model?
As the result of my researches, the lichens are not simple plants, not individuals in the ordinary sense of the word; they are, rather, colonies, which consist of hundreds of thousands of individuals, of which, however, one alone plays the master, while the rest, forever imprisoned, prepare the nutriment for themselves and their master. This master is a fungus of the class Ascomycetes, a parasite which is accustomed to live upon others work. Its slaves are green algae, which it has sought out, or indeed caught hold of, and compelled into its service. It surrounds them, as a spider its prey, with a fibrous net of narrow meshes, which is gradually converted into an impenetrable covering, but while the spider sucks its prey and leaves it dead, the fungus incites the algae found in its net to more rapid activity, even to more vigorous increase....
from Simon Schewendener's book on lichen published in German in Basel, Switzerland, 1869.
Comments:
1. The English translation of the above has syntax that makes for curious logic: As a result of my researches, ...the lichens are colonies, rather than something like, My research has discovered that the lichens are colonies.... Is the translation strictly accurate here? If so, theres a hidden desire to do more than merely describe the world, a desire not unlike that attributed to the fungus.
2. Schewendener has hints of pity for the slaves, but sides with the masters and seems to be foretelling Germanys own upcoming experiment with colonialism in Africa and elsewhere after unification in the next decade after Schewendener's book was published in 1869. Germany felt it needed a colonial empire to prove the virility of its new nationhood competing with rival European states, especially Britain, France, Portugal, and Holland. S. is particularly drawn to the idea that empires seem an advanced form of capitalism, able to increase the productivity levels of its workers, pushed to more visible increase.... There is also implicitly here the rationalization for such brutal production quotas: the workers benefit as well as the bosses.
3. The lichen ... are colonies is a revealing solecism. Strictly speaking, Schewendeners colonial trope is describing neither the colonies abroad nor the empires home turf, but rather a complex in which both imperial center and slave colonial production share the same spaces. That is, lichen is created from both fungus and algae and thus is not a distant colony but the empire itself, the network of colony and imperial center. Yet the metaphorically-charged writing above, despite its fascination with the seemingly invincible power of the masters, perhaps also suggests a fear of being too closely dependent upon the colony, of even being overthrown by it hundreds of individuals vs. one alone who plays the master. Especially intriguing is the phrase vigorous increase, which means to connote only those activities enforced and controlled by the master but which inevitably comes to suggest energy threatening to the Masters power (?).
4. of the class Ascomycetes...: for a hallucinatory moment, it seems as if Schewendener is describing a Greek or Roman tyrant and the classical city-state empires that were seen as precedents for European colonial ambitions many centuries later. A Thucydides of Mycobionts!
5. cf. Vernon Ahmadjian, who argues for parasitism of the funghi on the algae, using its photosynthetic properties for its own ends. Yet if this is what it is, it is a parasitism that does not kill the host but actually gives it more protection than it would have in its natural state. See Vernon Ahmadjians The Lichen Symbiosis (New York: John Wiley, 1993).
6. The Blob ('50s Hollywood movie) as wiggling with U.S. fear of colonization |
|
|
|
|
|
|